Evidence Library

The science of Perioperative Health.

The research that shapes how patients arrive at surgery, what preparation can change, and how recovery unfolds. Each entry sets out what investigators found and why it matters, with the full study a click away.

How the library is built

Chosen for what it teaches the field.

Perioperative Health draws on anesthesiology, surgery, nutrition science, rehabilitation, behavioral medicine and implementation research. The library brings the most instructive work from each into one place.

  1. Selected for clinical importance

    Guidelines, meta-analyses, landmark trials and the cohorts that defined how clinicians think about readiness and recovery.

  2. Summarized from the source

    Every citation is checked against its PubMed record, and every finding is written from the published study, with the intervention, route and population stated.

  3. Proposals labeled as proposals

    Where PERIOME puts forward its own frameworks, such as the Perioperative Resilience Index™, they are marked as proposed and set beside the evidence, never inside it.

Studies are included for their importance to the field, including trials that found no benefit.

The library

Six areas of the surgical journey.

From the physiology a patient brings to surgery to the way evidence becomes routine practice. Search by topic, author or outcome, or browse by area.

01

Physiologic Readiness

What a patient brings to surgery: metabolic state, frailty, functional capacity, nutritional and micronutrient status, and sleep.

  • Observational

    Vitamin C Deficiency: A Nutritional Blind Spot in Colorectal Surgery

    Mlaver E, Galloway L, Shaffer VO, et al. · Am Surg · 2026

    Key finding

    Nearly half of adults having elective colon resection had low plasma vitamin C after surgery: 13.7% met criteria for deficiency and a further 33.3% had hypovitaminosis C (47% overall). The authors note that micronutrient assessment is seldom part of ERAS pathways.

    Clinical significance

    Colorectal surgery quality programs focus on sterility, glycemia and fluids. This study identifies micronutrient status as a common and largely unmeasured variable in the same population.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective observational prevalence study
    Population
    51 adults undergoing elective major colon resection (cancer, diverticulitis, Crohn's disease); patients taking vitamin C excluded
    Intervention or exposure
    None (prevalence of postoperative vitamin C deficiency)
    Endpoints
    Plasma vitamin C concentration
    Limitations
    Levels drawn after surgery only, so preoperative status and the effect of surgery cannot be separated. 51 patients, no outcome data.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    The Prognostic Role of GLIM Criteria in Postoperative Outcomes after Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

    Lidoriki I, Frountzas M, Mela E, et al. · Nutr Cancer · 2023

    Key finding

    Across seven observational studies of 3662 patients having esophageal or gastric cancer surgery, malnutrition defined by GLIM criteria was associated with more postoperative complications (pooled HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.45–4.59) and shorter overall and disease-free survival.

    Clinical significance

    GLIM gives malnutrition a shared diagnostic definition. This pooled analysis shows that a standardized nutritional diagnosis before surgery carries prognostic information for complications and survival.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Population
    3662 patients undergoing esophageal or gastric cancer surgery (7 studies)
    Intervention or exposure
    GLIM-defined malnutrition before surgery
    Endpoints
    Overall postoperative complications, overall survival, disease-free survival
    Limitations
    Seven observational studies in upper gastrointestinal cancer only. Association with outcome does not show that treating malnutrition changes it.
  • Observational

    Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study

    Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Shulman MA, et al. · Lancet · 2018

    Key finding

    Anesthesiologists' subjective estimate of functional capacity identified only 19.2% of patients unable to reach four METs on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Among CPET, NT-proBNP, the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) and subjective assessment, only DASI scores were associated with 30-day death or myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 0.96 per point). The authors concluded subjective assessment should not be used for preoperative risk evaluation.

    Clinical significance

    This multicenter study helped shift how functional capacity is assessed before surgery, moving assessment from clinical impression toward short structured questionnaires such as DASI.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    International prospective cohort (25 hospitals in Canada, UK, Australia, New Zealand)
    Population
    1401 adults aged 40 and older with cardiac risk factors scheduled for major non-cardiac surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Subjective functional assessment compared with CPET, DASI and NT-proBNP
    Endpoints
    Death or myocardial infarction within 30 days; accuracy for identifying <4 METs on CPET
    Limitations
    Only 28 primary events, so prognostic estimates are imprecise. Population was enriched for cardiac risk.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining the Impact of Sleep Disturbance on Postoperative Delirium

    Fadayomi AB, Ibala R, Bilotta F, et al. · Crit Care Med · 2018

    Key finding

    Across 12 studies, preexisting sleep disturbance was associated with postoperative delirium (pooled OR 5.24, 95% CI 3.61–7.60), with a risk ratio of 2.90 in the six prospective studies. Obstructive sleep apnea and unspecified sleep disorders showed similar associations.

    Clinical significance

    Sleep is a preoperative state that is measurable and potentially modifiable, and here it tracks with one of the most consequential perioperative neurocognitive disorders. The authors identify trials targeting sleep as the open question.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
    Population
    12 studies of surgical patients with preoperative sleep assessment
    Intervention or exposure
    Preexisting sleep disturbance (including obstructive sleep apnea)
    Endpoints
    Postoperative delirium
    Limitations
    Observational studies with varied definitions of sleep disturbance. The pooled estimate describes association, not the effect of treating sleep.
  • Observational

    Massive and long-lasting decrease in vitamin C plasma levels as a consequence of extracorporeal circulation

    Rodemeister S, Duquesne M, Adolph M, et al. · Nutrition · 2014

    Key finding

    In patients having cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass, plasma vitamin C fell significantly during bypass and did not recover through discharge on postoperative day 6. A marker of lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde) rose sharply after unclamping, and the ascorbyl radical to ascorbate ratio stayed elevated throughout.

    Clinical significance

    Surgery can deplete a key antioxidant micronutrient and keep it low through early convalescence. Micronutrient status is dynamic across the surgical window, not fixed at the preoperative baseline.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective observational biomarker study
    Population
    29 adults undergoing cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
    Intervention or exposure
    Cardiopulmonary bypass (serial sampling from the day before surgery to postoperative day 6)
    Endpoints
    Plasma vitamin C, vitamin E, malondialdehyde, ascorbyl free radical
    Limitations
    29 patients in one high oxidative-stress setting (bypass). Biomarkers only; no clinical outcomes.
  • Observational

    Preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study

    Musallam KM, Tamim HM, Richards T, et al. · Lancet · 2011

    Key finding

    In 227,425 patients having major non-cardiac surgery, 30% had preoperative anemia. Anemia, even mild, was independently associated with higher 30-day mortality (adjusted OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.31–1.54) and composite morbidity (adjusted OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.30–1.40).

    Clinical significance

    Preoperative anemia is common, detectable weeks before surgery and associated with worse outcomes at mild levels. This study helped establish anemia screening as a preoperative optimization target and informs patient blood management.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Retrospective cohort (ACS NSQIP registry, 211 hospitals, 2008)
    Population
    227,425 adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Preoperative anemia (mild: hematocrit >29% to <39% in men, <36% in women; moderate-to-severe: ≤29%)
    Endpoints
    30-day mortality and composite morbidity (cardiac, respiratory, CNS, urinary, wound, sepsis, venous thromboembolism)
    Limitations
    Registry association; residual confounding by the conditions that cause anemia is possible. Industry-funded (Vifor Pharma).
  • Observational

    Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients

    Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. · J Am Coll Surg · 2010

    Key finding

    In 594 adults aged 65 and older having elective surgery, frailty was independently associated with postoperative complications (frail: OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.12–5.77), longer stay, and discharge to a skilled or assisted-living facility (frail: OR 20.48). Adding frailty improved the predictive power of the ASA, Lee and Eagle risk indices.

    Clinical significance

    Frailty captures physiologic reserve that diagnosis-based risk scores miss. This study helped establish standardized frailty assessment as part of preoperative evaluation in older adults.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective cohort
    Population
    594 adults aged 65 and older presenting for elective surgery at one university hospital (2005–2006)
    Intervention or exposure
    Frailty measured on a validated 5-item scale (weakness, weight loss, exhaustion, low activity, slow gait)
    Endpoints
    30-day complications, length of stay, discharge disposition; added predictive value over ASA, Lee and Eagle indices
    Limitations
    Single center. Wide confidence intervals for the frail group, particularly for discharge disposition.
  • Mechanistic / physiologic

    Surgery-induced insulin resistance in human patients: relation to glucose transport and utilization

    Thorell A, Nygren J, Hirshman MF, et al. · Am J Physiol · 1999

    Key finding

    Elective hip replacement reduced insulin-stimulated glucose disposal immediately after surgery. Muscle biopsies showed reduced nonoxidative glucose disposal and glycogen synthase activity, with impaired GLUT-4 translocation in half of patients, locating the insulin resistance in skeletal muscle.

    Clinical significance

    Surgical insulin resistance is a direct physiologic consequence of the operation, not only of illness or fasting. This mechanistic work underpins the metabolic rationale for modern perioperative feeding and glycemic practice.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Mechanistic physiologic study; pre/post comparison with hyperinsulinemic clamp and muscle biopsy
    Population
    6 otherwise healthy adults undergoing total hip replacement
    Intervention or exposure
    Elective surgery (studied before, during and after)
    Endpoints
    Insulin-stimulated glucose disposal, glucose oxidation, endogenous glucose production, GLUT-4 translocation, glycogen synthase activity
    Limitations
    Six patients and one procedure. Physiologic endpoints only, with no clinical outcomes.
  • Proposed framework

    The six physiologic domains of perioperative readiness

    PERIOME · Proposed. Not validated.

    What it proposes

    PERIOME organizes perioperative preparation and recovery support around six physiologic domains: Hydration and Electrolytes; Metabolic and Recovery Capacity; Neurocognitive Resilience; Immune and Inflammatory Resilience; GI Integrity and Microbiome; and Micronutrient Foundation. It is a working structure for preparation across the whole surgical window, before, on the day of, and after surgery.

    Why it matters

    Perioperative care usually addresses one organ system or risk factor at a time. A domain structure asks whether preparation is better organized around the several physiologic reserves that surgery draws on together.

    What has to be shown
    Population
    Adults preparing for and recovering from surgery
    Validation ahead
    The research agenda has three parts: whether the domains are distinct and clinically meaningful when examined against established measures such as frailty, functional capacity, nutritional status, sleep and cognition; whether each can be assessed reliably in routine care; and whether organizing preparation this way makes it more consistent and complete. The domain structure is not a validated model of readiness.

02

Preparation and Optimization

What the weeks before an operation can change: prehabilitation, nutrition, carbohydrate loading, education and behavior.

  • Randomized trial

    Home-Based Prehabilitation for Older Surgical Patients With Frailty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    McIsaac DI, Lee S, Fergusson D, et al. · JAMA Surg · 2026

    Key finding

    In 847 adults aged 60 and older with frailty, offering coach-supported, home-based prehabilitation (exercise plus personalized nutrition recommendations) did not improve 30-day disability or reduce in-hospital complications compared with publicly available guidance. Participants completed a median of 4 weeks; competing priorities and motivation were the main barriers to adherence.

    Clinical significance

    This large pragmatic trial shows that offering prehabilitation is not the same as delivering it. Adherence and program design now sit at the center of prehabilitation research for older surgical patients.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Pragmatic multicenter randomized trial with embedded qualitative assessment (13 Canadian centers)
    Population
    847 adults aged 60 and older with frailty (Clinical Frailty Scale ≥4) scheduled for elective inpatient noncardiac surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Home-based multimodal exercise and nutrition program with remote coaching vs public activity and nutrition guidelines
    Endpoints
    Co-primary: WHODAS 2.0 disability at 30 days and any in-hospital complication; adherence barriers
    Limitations
    Control group received active guidance, which narrows the contrast. The lower disability seen in participants completing more than 75% of exercises is a non-randomized subgroup.
  • Guideline

    ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in surgery - Update 2025

    Weimann A, Bezmarevic M, Braga M, et al. · Clin Nutr · 2025

    Key finding

    The 2025 ESPEN guideline sets out 44 recommendations for nutrition in elective and non-elective surgery. Its core principles: integrate nutrition into overall management, avoid long preoperative fasting, restart oral feeding as early as possible, begin nutritional therapy as soon as nutritional risk is apparent, maintain metabolic control, and mobilize early. New recommendations cover frailty assessment, sarcopenia diagnosis and prehabilitation.

    Clinical significance

    This is the current European standard of care for surgical nutrition. It treats nutrition as part of perioperative management rather than an adjunct, and it extends that responsibility to preparation before surgery.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Clinical practice guideline (update of the 2017 guideline and 2021 practical guideline)
    Population
    Adults undergoing elective and non-elective surgery, with emphasis on major and cancer surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Perioperative nutritional assessment and therapy, including ERAS nutritional elements
    Endpoints
    Graded practice recommendations
    Limitations
    Recommendations are strongest for patients at nutritional risk and major (especially upper GI) surgery. The abstract does not state individual recommendation grades.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Prehabilitation versus no prehabilitation to improve functional capacity, reduce postoperative complications and improve quality of life in colorectal cancer surgery

    Molenaar CJ, van Rooijen SJ, Fokkenrood HJ, et al. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2023

    Key finding

    Across three randomized trials (250 patients), a four-week trimodal prehabilitation program (exercise, nutrition, anxiety reduction) before colorectal cancer surgery improved preoperative 6-minute walk distance by 24.9 meters (95% CI 11.2–38.6; moderate certainty). Effects on complications, emergency department visits and readmissions were small or trivial.

    Clinical significance

    Multimodal prehabilitation improves functional capacity before surgery, on moderate-certainty evidence. Whether that gain changes clinical outcomes is the central unanswered question, and this review frames the trials needed to answer it.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials (GRADE)
    Population
    250 adults with non-metastatic colorectal cancer scheduled for elective, mainly laparoscopic surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Four-week multimodal prehabilitation (exercise, nutritional intervention, anxiety reduction) vs the same program started after surgery
    Endpoints
    Functional capacity (6-minute walk test), complications, ED visits, readmissions, quality of life
    Limitations
    Only three trials, and the comparator was rehabilitation rather than no intervention. Most outcomes were downgraded for risk of bias and imprecision.
    Certainty
    Moderate (preoperative 6-minute walk); low (complications, ED visits, readmissions); low to very low (postoperative 6-minute walk)
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Effects of Nutritional Prehabilitation, With and Without Exercise, on Outcomes of Patients Who Undergo Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Gillis C, Buhler K, Bresee L, et al. · Gastroenterology · 2018

    Key finding

    Across nine studies (914 patients) of colorectal surgery, nutritional prehabilitation for at least seven days, alone or combined with exercise, reduced hospital stay by 2.2 days (95% CI 0.9–3.5) compared with no prehabilitation. Individual trials showed faster return to presurgical walking capacity with multimodal programs.

    Clinical significance

    Nutrition delivered before surgery, not only after it, was associated with a meaningful difference in hospital stay. This review helped move preoperative nutrition from a supportive measure to a component of preparation.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis (5 randomized trials, 4 cohort studies)
    Population
    914 adults awaiting colorectal resection (438 prehabilitation, 476 control)
    Intervention or exposure
    At least 7 days of nutritional prehabilitation (oral nutritional supplements with or without counseling), with or without exercise
    Endpoints
    Length of hospital stay (primary); 6-minute walk test (secondary)
    Limitations
    Pooled estimate mixes randomized and observational studies, and the four cohort studies were at high risk of bias. Functional outcomes could not be pooled.
  • Consensus / nomenclature

    American Society for Enhanced Recovery and Perioperative Quality Initiative Joint Consensus Statement on Nutrition Screening and Therapy Within a Surgical Enhanced Recovery Pathway

    Wischmeyer PE, Carli F, Evans DC, et al. · Anesth Analg · 2018

    Key finding

    An international ASER and Perioperative Quality Initiative consensus made a strong recommendation for routine preoperative nutrition screening to identify patients who need nutritional optimization before surgery. It recommends restarting nutrition immediately after surgery, prioritizing protein over total calories, and supporting nutrition after discharge with oral supplements.

    Clinical significance

    Malnutrition is a strong independent predictor of poor outcomes, yet U.S. implementation of perioperative nutrition guidance has been limited. This statement translates the evidence into a screening-first workflow that spans the whole surgical journey, including after discharge.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Expert consensus statement (modified Delphi, Perioperative Quality Initiative)
    Population
    Adults undergoing surgery within enhanced recovery pathways
    Intervention or exposure
    Preoperative nutrition screening and perioperative nutrition therapy (oral supplements, enteral, parenteral)
    Endpoints
    Consensus recommendations
    Limitations
    Expert consensus rather than new data. The abstract does not grade the strength of evidence behind each recommendation.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation

    Thomsen T, Villebro N, Møller AM · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2014

    Key finding

    Intensive preoperative smoking-cessation programs, beginning four to eight weeks before surgery with weekly counseling and nicotine replacement, increased abstinence at surgery (RR 10.76) and reduced postoperative complications (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27–0.65) and wound complications (RR 0.31). Brief interventions increased short-term quitting modestly (RR 1.30) but did not reduce complications.

    Clinical significance

    Smoking is one of the clearest modifiable perioperative risks, and the scheduling of surgery is a natural moment for behavior change. The finding that intensity and lead time determine benefit makes preoperative timing a design variable, not an afterthought.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials
    Population
    2010 adults who smoked and were scheduled for surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Preoperative smoking-cessation interventions: intensive or brief behavioral support, nicotine replacement, varenicline
    Endpoints
    Abstinence at surgery and at 12 months; postoperative complications
    Limitations
    Complication benefit rests on two small trials of intensive intervention (210 participants). Few trials contributed to each comparison.
    Certainty
    Moderate (overall, per review authors)
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Preoperative carbohydrate treatment for enhancing recovery after elective surgery

    Smith MD, McCall J, Plank L, et al. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2014

    Key finding

    Across 27 randomized trials (1976 patients), a preoperative carbohydrate drink (at least 45 g within four hours of surgery) improved postoperative insulin sensitivity (high-quality evidence) and was associated with a modest reduction in hospital stay of 0.30 days compared with placebo or fasting. Complication rates did not change (RR 0.98), and no aspiration pneumonitis was reported.

    Clinical significance

    Replacing overnight fasting with a carbohydrate drink improves postoperative insulin sensitivity, and no aspiration pneumonitis was reported across the included trials. This evidence underlies the move away from 'nothing by mouth after midnight' in ERAS pathways.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Population
    1976 adults undergoing elective abdominal, orthopedic, cardiac or thyroid surgery (27 trials)
    Intervention or exposure
    Oral carbohydrate ≥45 g within 4 hours of surgery vs placebo or fasting
    Endpoints
    Length of stay, time to flatus, insulin sensitivity (clamp), complications, aspiration pneumonitis
    Limitations
    Most trials had at least one domain at high risk of bias, chiefly inadequate blinding of subjective outcomes. The length-of-stay effect was not seen against placebo alone.
    Certainty
    High (insulin sensitivity); low (complications); very low (length of stay)
  • Randomized trial

    Prehabilitation versus rehabilitation: a randomized control trial in patients undergoing colorectal resection for cancer

    Gillis C, Li C, Lee L, et al. · Anesthesiology · 2014

    Key finding

    In patients having colorectal cancer resection, a four-week multimodal program started before surgery increased walking capacity before the operation in 53% of patients vs 15% when started after surgery. At eight weeks, 84% vs 62% had recovered to baseline exercise capacity (6-minute walk difference 45.4 m, 95% CI 13.9–77.0). Complications and length of stay were similar.

    Clinical significance

    This trial showed that the weeks before surgery are a usable window for changing a patient's recovery trajectory. It shaped the design of prehabilitation research that followed.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Single-blind randomized controlled trial
    Population
    77 adults undergoing colorectal resection for cancer, within an enhanced recovery pathway
    Intervention or exposure
    Home-based aerobic and resistance exercise, nutritional counseling with protein supplementation and relaxation, started 4 weeks before surgery vs immediately after
    Endpoints
    6-minute walk test (primary); complications, length of stay
    Limitations
    77 patients at one center. The program was multimodal, so individual components cannot be isolated.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Preoperative education for hip or knee replacement

    McDonald S, Page MJ, Beringer K, et al. · Cochrane Database Syst Rev · 2014

    Key finding

    Across 18 trials (1463 patients) of hip or knee replacement, generic preoperative education did not clearly improve postoperative anxiety, pain, function or adverse events over usual care. The authors suggest education stratified to need may help selected patients, such as those with anxiety, depression or unrealistic expectations.

    Clinical significance

    Information alone is not preparation. This review shows why one-size education rarely moves outcomes and points toward education tailored to the patient's physical, psychological and social needs.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and quasi-randomized trials
    Population
    1463 adults undergoing total hip or knee replacement (18 trials)
    Intervention or exposure
    Verbal, written or audiovisual preoperative education within 6 weeks of surgery vs usual care
    Endpoints
    Pain, function, anxiety, quality of life, length of stay, adverse events
    Limitations
    Few trials reported each outcome, allocation concealment and blinding were often inadequate, and education formats varied widely.
    Certainty
    Low (anxiety, pain, function in hip replacement); very low (adverse events)

03

Perioperative Care

Evidence-based pathways, risk assessment and the physiology of the operative period.

  • Guideline

    2023 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting: Carbohydrate-containing Clear Liquids with or without Protein, Chewing Gum, and Pediatric Fasting Duration-A Modular Update of the 2017 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting

    Joshi GP, Abdelmalak BB, Weigel WA, et al. · Anesthesiology · 2023

    Key finding

    The American Society of Anesthesiologists' 2023 modular update to its preoperative fasting guideline addresses three questions not covered previously: carbohydrate-containing clear liquids with or without protein, chewing gum, and fasting duration in children.

    Clinical significance

    Preoperative fasting rules are among the most consequential routine instructions a surgical patient receives. This update brings carbohydrate-containing drinks formally into the U.S. anesthesiology guideline framework.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Clinical practice guideline (modular update of the 2017 ASA fasting guideline)
    Population
    Healthy patients undergoing elective procedures
    Intervention or exposure
    Carbohydrate-containing clear liquids, with or without protein; chewing gum; pediatric fasting duration
    Endpoints
    Practice recommendations
    Limitations
    Applies to healthy patients having elective procedures. The abstract states scope only; the specific recommendations are in the full text.
  • Guideline

    Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018

    Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M, et al. · World J Surg · 2019

    Key finding

    The fourth ERAS Society guideline for elective colorectal surgery gives a graded recommendation for every element of the enhanced recovery protocol, from preadmission through discharge. Each recommendation is rated by GRADE, drawing on meta-analyses, randomized trials and large prospective cohorts.

    Clinical significance

    This is the reference protocol for colorectal ERAS and a template that other specialties have adapted. It defines perioperative care as a sequence of evidence-graded elements spanning before, during and after surgery.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Consensus clinical practice guideline (GRADE)
    Population
    Adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Multimodal ERAS protocol elements
    Endpoints
    Graded recommendations with level of evidence for each item
    Limitations
    Specific to colorectal surgery. Individual recommendations and their grades are in the full text, not the abstract.
  • Randomized trial

    Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery

    Myles PS, Bellomo R, Corcoran T, et al. · N Engl J Med · 2018

    Key finding

    In 3000 patients at increased risk having major abdominal surgery, a restrictive intravenous-fluid regimen (median 3.7 L vs 6.1 L over the first 24 hours) did not improve one-year disability-free survival (81.9% vs 82.3%) and was associated with more acute kidney injury (8.6% vs 5.0%).

    Clinical significance

    RELIEF reversed a widely adopted ERAS assumption that less intravenous fluid is better. It supports a moderately liberal, balanced approach and shows why individual pathway elements need their own trials.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Pragmatic international randomized trial
    Population
    3000 adults at increased risk of complications undergoing major abdominal surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Restrictive vs liberal intravenous-fluid regimen during surgery and up to 24 hours afterward
    Endpoints
    Disability-free survival at 1 year (primary); acute kidney injury, renal-replacement therapy, septic complications, surgical-site infection
    Limitations
    Intraoperative and early postoperative intravenous fluid only, so it does not address oral hydration before or after surgery. Surgical-site infection and renal-replacement differences were not significant after adjustment for multiple testing.
  • Narrative review

    Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review

    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC · JAMA Surg · 2017

    Key finding

    Enhanced Recovery After Surgery is a multimodal, multidisciplinary care process that replaces overnight fasting with carbohydrate drinks two hours before surgery, favors minimally invasive approaches and balanced fluids, and promotes early feeding and mobilization. The authors report that ERAS protocols have shortened hospital stay by 30% to 50%, with similar reductions in complications.

    Clinical significance

    ERAS showed that coordinated, protocolized care across the whole surgical episode changes outcomes. Its emphasis on auditing compliance made measurement part of the intervention.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Narrative review
    Population
    Surgical patients across specialties (ERAS literature)
    Intervention or exposure
    ERAS care pathway and structured implementation
    Endpoints
    Length of stay, complications, readmissions, cost (as summarized)
    Limitations
    Narrative review by ERAS Society leaders. Outcome figures are summarized from the literature, not newly pooled.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Peri-operative intravenous administration of magnesium sulphate and postoperative pain: a meta-analysis

    Albrecht E, Kirkham KR, Liu SS, et al. · Anaesthesia · 2013

    Key finding

    Across 25 placebo-controlled randomized trials, perioperative intravenous magnesium sulfate reduced 24-hour morphine consumption by 24.4% (7.6 mg) and modestly lowered pain scores at rest and on movement, with no serious adverse effects reported.

    Clinical significance

    Magnesium-related pathways, including NMDA receptor antagonism, are a recognized target in multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia. This meta-analysis is one of the main sources supporting intravenous magnesium as an anesthetic adjunct.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Population
    Surgical patients in 25 placebo-controlled trials
    Intervention or exposure
    Perioperative intravenous magnesium sulfate (bolus or infusion) vs placebo
    Endpoints
    Cumulative IV morphine consumption and pain scores at 24 hours
    Limitations
    Intravenous dosing during anesthesia, so the findings do not speak to oral magnesium intake. Pain-score reductions were small (4 to 9 points on a 100-point scale).
  • Narrative review

    Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation

    Kehlet H · Br J Anaesth · 1997

    Key finding

    Kehlet identified the surgical stress response, with its endocrine, metabolic and inflammatory cascades, as the key driver of postoperative morbidity apart from technical failures. He argued that no single intervention eliminates that morbidity, but multimodal interventions may substantially reduce it.

    Clinical significance

    This paper is the conceptual origin of multimodal perioperative care and of enhanced recovery. It reframed postoperative complications as a physiologic response that can be anticipated and managed.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Narrative review and expert synthesis
    Population
    Patients undergoing major surgery (literature synthesis)
    Intervention or exposure
    Multimodal modification of the surgical stress response
    Endpoints
    Postoperative morbidity and recovery (conceptual)
    Limitations
    Narrative synthesis without new data or a systematic search.

04

Recovery Science

How people recover after surgery, at home as well as in hospital, including cognition and function.

  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    Sleep disturbances and sleep disorders as risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Varallo G, Giusti EM, Manna C, et al. · Sleep Med Rev · 2022

    Key finding

    Across 12 cohort studies, preoperative sleep disturbances and sleep disorders were associated with chronic postsurgical pain at three months or later (r=0.13, 95% CI 0.06–0.20). The association was clearest for pain intensity and after knee arthroplasty, and grew with longer follow-up.

    Clinical significance

    Chronic postsurgical pain is a common long-term complication of surgery. Sleep before the operation is a measurable state that may help identify patients at risk well before they reach recovery.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
    Population
    Adults with preoperative sleep assessment and pain follow-up of at least 3 months (18 studies reviewed, 12 pooled)
    Intervention or exposure
    Preoperative sleep disturbance or sleep disorder (including insomnia)
    Endpoints
    Chronic postsurgical pain intensity, presence, or opioid use at ≥3 months
    Limitations
    Small pooled effect size with heterogeneity across procedures and sleep measures. Observational association only.
    Certainty
    Low
  • Observational

    Using Smartphones to Capture Novel Recovery Metrics After Cancer Surgery

    Panda N, Solsky I, Huang EJ, et al. · JAMA Surg · 2020

    Key finding

    Continuous smartphone accelerometer data, collected from one week before to six months after cancer surgery, distinguished recovery trajectories. Patients with a postoperative complication, ED visit or readmission had about 40 fewer minutes of daily exertional activity than their own baseline at weeks 1 through 6.

    Clinical significance

    Passive data from a device patients already carry can measure physical recovery at home against each patient's own preoperative baseline. That makes recovery observable after discharge, where much of it happens.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective observational cohort
    Population
    62 adults (of 139 approached) undergoing elective skin, soft tissue, head and neck, or abdominal cancer operations at one U.S. academic center
    Intervention or exposure
    Smartphone accelerometer monitoring (1 week preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively)
    Endpoints
    Daily exertional activity vs baseline; ability to reach 60 minutes daily activity; postoperative events
    Limitations
    62 patients at one center, limited to smartphone owners. Activity tracked outcomes but was not tested as an early-warning tool.
  • Observational

    Association of Wearable Activity Monitors With Assessment of Daily Ambulation and Length of Stay Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery

    Daskivich TJ, Houman J, Lopez M, et al. · JAMA Netw Open · 2019

    Key finding

    Wearable monitors showed that physician ambulation orders poorly reflected how much inpatients actually walked after major surgery: under the same order, daily steps ranged from 0 to 7698. Higher step counts on postoperative day 1, up to 1000 steps, were associated with lower odds of prolonged hospital stay (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.84), with no further benefit above 1000.

    Clinical significance

    Early mobilization is a core recovery target that is rarely measured. Objective step counts gave a simple, early signal associated with length of stay and exposed the gap between what is ordered and what happens.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective cohort
    Population
    100 adults undergoing 8 inpatient operations at one tertiary center
    Intervention or exposure
    Wrist-worn activity monitor measuring daily postoperative step count
    Endpoints
    Daily step count by operation and by physician order; prolonged length of stay (>70th percentile)
    Limitations
    100 patients at one center, in hospital only. Association with length of stay does not show that walking more shortens it.
  • Observational

    Association of postdischarge complications with reoperation and mortality in general surgery

    Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Sosa JA · Arch Surg · 2012

    Key finding

    Among 551,510 general surgery patients, 41.5% of all 30-day complications occurred after discharge, and 75% of those within 14 days. Patients with a post-discharge complication had higher rates of reoperation (17.9% vs 4.6%) and death (6.9% vs 2.0%).

    Clinical significance

    Much of surgical morbidity happens at home, in the period when patients have the least contact with their care team. This finding is a central argument for structured follow-up in the first two weeks after discharge.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Retrospective cohort (ACS NSQIP, 2005–2010)
    Population
    551,510 adults undergoing 21 groups of inpatient general surgery procedures
    Intervention or exposure
    None (descriptive; timing of complications relative to discharge)
    Endpoints
    Post-discharge complications, reoperation and mortality within 30 days
    Limitations
    Registry data limited to 30 days and to general surgery. The reoperation and mortality comparisons are associations.
  • Observational

    Predictors of cognitive dysfunction after major noncardiac surgery

    Monk TG, Weldon BC, Garvan CW, et al. · Anesthesiology · 2008

    Key finding

    Cognitive decline at hospital discharge after major noncardiac surgery was common at every age (31% to 41%). At three months it persisted only in patients aged 60 and older (12.7%), and patients with cognitive decline at both time points were more likely to die within the first year.

    Clinical significance

    Postoperative cognitive change, studied at the time as postoperative cognitive dysfunction and now classed among the perioperative neurocognitive disorders, is a recovery outcome with prognostic weight, particularly in older adults.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective longitudinal cohort with age-matched controls
    Population
    1064 adults aged 18 and older undergoing major noncardiac surgery at one U.S. center
    Intervention or exposure
    Major noncardiac surgery (neuropsychological testing before, at discharge and at 3 months)
    Endpoints
    Postoperative cognitive dysfunction at discharge and 3 months; 1-year mortality
    Limitations
    Single center. Uses the older postoperative cognitive dysfunction definition; mortality findings are associations.
  • Observational

    Functional independence after major abdominal surgery in the elderly

    Lawrence VA, Hazuda HP, Cornell JE, et al. · J Am Coll Surg · 2004

    Key finding

    After major abdominal surgery in adults aged 60 and older, function fell most at one week. Mean recovery took 3 weeks for cognition, 3 months for daily activities and 6 months for instrumental activities; grip strength had not recovered at 6 months. At 6 months, 19% still had IADL disability, and preoperative physical conditioning and depression predicted recovery.

    Clinical significance

    Discharge is not the same as recovery. This cohort documented how long functional recovery takes in older adults and identified preoperative conditioning as a modifiable predictor.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective cohort
    Population
    372 consecutive adults aged 60 and older undergoing elective major abdominal surgery (private and university hospitals)
    Intervention or exposure
    Major abdominal surgery (serial assessment preoperatively to 6 months)
    Endpoints
    ADL, IADL, SF-36, depression, cognition, timed walk, functional reach, grip strength
    Limitations
    Cohort predates widespread enhanced recovery pathways. Predictors are associations.
  • Observational

    Long-term postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the elderly ISPOCD1 study. ISPOCD investigators. International Study of Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction

    Moller JT, Cluitmans P, Rasmussen LS, et al. · Lancet · 1998

    Key finding

    In 1218 patients aged 60 and older after major non-cardiac surgery, cognitive dysfunction was present in 25.8% at one week and 9.9% at three months, compared with 3.4% and 2.8% of controls. Age was the only risk factor for late dysfunction; intraoperative hypoxemia and hypotension were not risk factors.

    Clinical significance

    ISPOCD1 established that cognitive change after non-cardiac surgery is common and can persist in older adults. Studied at the time as postoperative cognitive dysfunction, it is now classed among the perioperative neurocognitive disorders and shapes how older patients are counseled before surgery.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    International multicenter prospective cohort with non-surgical controls
    Population
    1218 adults aged 60 and older undergoing major non-cardiac surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Major non-cardiac surgery; continuous oximetry and blood pressure monitoring
    Endpoints
    Postoperative cognitive dysfunction at 1 week and 3 months; risk factors
    Limitations
    Uses the older postoperative cognitive dysfunction definition based on neuropsychological test change. Did not test interventions.

05

Measurement Science

How readiness and recovery are measured, and which instruments have been validated.

  • Consensus / nomenclature

    Systematic review and consensus definitions for the Standardised Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine (StEP) initiative: patient comfort

    Myles PS, Boney O, Botti M, et al. · Br J Anaesth · 2018

    Key finding

    The StEP initiative's systematic review and Delphi consensus recommended six standardized patient-comfort endpoints for perioperative trials: pain at 24 hours (rest and movement), nausea and vomiting, a quality-of-recovery scale (QoR or QoR-15), time to gastrointestinal recovery, time to mobilization, and sleep quality.

    Clinical significance

    Shared endpoints make perioperative trials comparable and poolable. The inclusion of sleep quality and validated recovery scales marks the patient's own experience as a core outcome.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review plus multi-round Delphi consensus
    Population
    Clinician researchers (up to 89) reviewing 122 studies
    Intervention or exposure
    Standardized endpoint definitions for perioperative trials
    Endpoints
    Recommended patient-comfort endpoints
    Limitations
    Designed for clinical trials rather than routine care. Covers the patient-comfort domain only.
  • Consensus / nomenclature

    Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018

    Evered L, Silbert B, Knopman DS, et al. · Br J Anaesth · 2018

    Key finding

    A multispecialty working group recommended 'perioperative neurocognitive disorders' as the overarching term for cognitive impairment identified before or after surgery, aligned with DSM-5. It covers preexisting neurocognitive disorder, postoperative delirium, delayed neurocognitive recovery (to 30 days) and postoperative neurocognitive disorder (to 12 months).

    Clinical significance

    Common terminology linked to general-population classifications lets perioperative cognitive research connect with the broader dementia and cognition literature. It replaced the inconsistent use of 'postoperative cognitive dysfunction'.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Modified Delphi consensus
    Population
    Multispecialty working group
    Intervention or exposure
    Nomenclature for perioperative cognitive change
    Endpoints
    Recommended classification and terms
    Limitations
    Terminology consensus; no outcome data.
  • Systematic review / meta-analysis

    How Do We Value Postoperative Recovery?: A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Patient-reported Outcomes After Abdominal Surgery

    Fiore JF, Figueiredo S, Balvardi S, et al. · Ann Surg · 2018

    Key finding

    A COSMIN-based review of 35 studies evaluating 22 patient-reported outcome measures of recovery after abdominal surgery found that 74% of studies were of poor or fair methodological quality. None of the instruments met the International Society for Quality of Life Research minimum standards.

    Clinical significance

    Value-based surgical care depends on valid patient-reported measures of recovery. This review documents how much of that measurement foundation is still unbuilt.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Systematic review of measurement properties (COSMIN)
    Population
    35 studies of 22 PROMs used after abdominal surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    None (appraisal of PROM measurement properties)
    Endpoints
    Measurement properties against ISOQOL minimum standards
    Limitations
    Limited to abdominal surgery and to literature up to 2018. Newer instruments may have stronger evidence.
  • Validation study

    Validation of days at home as an outcome measure after surgery: a prospective cohort study in Australia

    Myles PS, Shulman MA, Heritier S, et al. · BMJ Open · 2017

    Key finding

    Using data from seven trials (2109 patients), days at home within 30 days of surgery (DAH30) was lower in older patients, those with poorer physical function and those with longer operations. Postoperative complications were associated with 3.0 fewer days at home after adjustment (95% CI 2.1–4.0).

    Clinical significance

    DAH30 combines length of stay, readmission, discharge destination and death into one outcome that patients understand and health systems can obtain from routine data.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective cohort (secondary analysis of clinical trial data)
    Population
    2109 surgical patients from seven trials in Australia
    Intervention or exposure
    None (validation of DAH30 as an outcome measure)
    Endpoints
    DAH30; association with serious complications
    Limitations
    Derived from trial participants in one country, who may differ from routine-care patients. Tests construct validity, not responsiveness to an intervention.
  • Validation study

    Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales

    Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, et al. · Anesthesiology · 2016

    Key finding

    In 204 patients recovering from surgery, the minimal clinically important difference was 0.9 points for the QoR score, 8.0 for the QoR-15 and 6.3 for the QoR-40.

    Clinical significance

    A recovery score is useful only if clinicians know what size of change matters to patients. These thresholds let trials and quality programs interpret quality-of-recovery results.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective cohort (anchor- and distribution-based methods)
    Population
    204 unselected adults recovering from surgery and anesthesia
    Intervention or exposure
    None (measurement study of three QoR scales)
    Endpoints
    MCID for QoR, QoR-15 and QoR-40
    Limitations
    Only 24 patients completed the third interview. Thresholds may differ in other surgical populations.
  • Validation study

    Measurement of disability-free survival after surgery

    Shulman MA, Myles PS, Chan MT, et al. · Anesthesiology · 2015

    Key finding

    In 510 surgical patients followed for 12 months, the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 was valid, reliable (Cronbach's alpha above 0.90) and responsive for measuring postoperative disability. Patients with new disability had longer hospital stays (6.9 vs 5.3 days) and more 30-day complications (20% vs 11%).

    Clinical significance

    Survival free of disability is arguably the outcome patients care about most. This validation made it measurable and has since served as the primary endpoint of major perioperative trials.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Prospective multicenter psychometric validation study
    Population
    510 adults undergoing a range of surgical procedures
    Intervention or exposure
    WHODAS 2.0 administered up to 12 months after surgery
    Endpoints
    Validity, reliability, responsiveness, clinical acceptability
    Limitations
    Validation cohort from academic centers. Minimal clinically important change was not reported in this abstract.
  • Validation study

    Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons

    Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, et al. · J Am Coll Surg · 2013

    Key finding

    Built from 1,414,006 patients at 393 hospitals, the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator uses 21 preoperative factors to predict eight outcomes. It discriminated well for mortality (c-statistic 0.944) and morbidity (0.816), performing as well as procedure-specific models.

    Clinical significance

    Patient-specific, empirically derived risk estimates support shared decision-making and informed consent. The calculator is now a widely used preoperative risk tool in the United States.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Model development and validation study (ACS NSQIP registry)
    Population
    1,414,006 patients across 1557 procedure codes at 393 hospitals; 80 surgeons for the adjustment score
    Intervention or exposure
    Universal regression-based risk model with optional surgeon adjustment
    Endpoints
    Discrimination (c-statistic) and calibration (Brier score) for mortality, morbidity and six complications
    Limitations
    Developed and evaluated within NSQIP hospitals. Performance in individual institutions and specific procedures needs local validation.
  • Validation study

    Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15

    Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA · Anesthesiology · 2013

    Key finding

    The QoR-15, a 15-item short form of the QoR-40, showed good convergent validity (r=0.68), internal consistency (0.85), test-retest reliability (0.99) and responsiveness (effect size 1.35) in 127 patients after general anesthesia. It took about 2.4 minutes to complete.

    Clinical significance

    QoR-15 is now one of the standard patient-reported measures of early recovery, recommended by the StEP initiative for perioperative trials.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Instrument development and psychometric validation
    Population
    127 adults after general anesthesia and surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    QoR-15 questionnaire
    Endpoints
    Validity, reliability, responsiveness, feasibility
    Limitations
    Single development cohort of 127 patients. Measures early postoperative recovery only.
  • Proposed framework

    Perioperative Resilience Index (PRI™): a proposed readiness framework

    PERIOME · Proposed. Not validated.

    What it proposes

    The Perioperative Resilience Index is a proposed research framework for describing a patient's physiologic readiness for surgery across multiple domains. It starts from the premise that readiness is a state before it is a number, and it is designed to be studied alongside established measures such as functional capacity, frailty and quality-of-recovery scales.

    Why it matters

    Current preoperative assessment estimates risk well but describes readiness poorly. A readiness measure that is patient-centered and sensitive to preparation would let clinicians see whether a patient is getting more ready, not only how risky the operation is.

    What has to be shown
    Design
    Proposed measurement framework
    Population
    Adults scheduled for surgery
    Validation ahead
    The research agenda: establish construct validity against DASI, frailty, nutritional and patient-reported recovery measures; demonstrate reliability; show that a PRI assessment adds information beyond established risk tools such as ASA status and the ACS NSQIP calculator; show responsiveness to preparation; and define what size of change is clinically meaningful. Only then can its use be tested for effects on decisions and outcomes. No PERIOME data on it have been published.

06

Implementation and Intelligence

How evidence becomes routine practice, and what follow-up after discharge has shown.

  • Randomized trial

    Post-discharge after surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring-1 (PVC-RAM-1) technology versus standard care: randomised controlled trial

    McGillion MH, Parlow J, Borges FK, et al. · BMJ · 2021

    Key finding

    In 905 adults discharged after non-elective surgery, 30 days of nurse-led virtual care with remote automated monitoring did not increase days alive at home (29.7 vs 29.5). It did detect and correct more medication errors (29.7% vs 5.5% detected) and reduced the proportion of patients reporting pain at 7, 15 and 30 days.

    Clinical significance

    This trial shows that structured remote follow-up after discharge is feasible at scale and changes measurable care processes. It also shows that the headline outcome a program targets must match what the program can realistically move.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Multicenter randomized controlled trial (8 Canadian hospitals)
    Population
    905 adults aged 40 and older discharged after non-elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Intervention or exposure
    Tablet-based virtual nursing care with daily remote monitoring of vital signs, weight and wound photos for 30 days vs usual care
    Endpoints
    Days alive at home over 31 days (primary); acute hospital care, medication errors, pain
    Limitations
    Participants and clinicians were unblinded, and the trial ran during the pandemic. The reduction in acute hospital care (22.0% vs 27.3%) did not reach significance.
  • Observational

    Association Between Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol and Postoperative Complications in Colorectal Surgery: The Postoperative Outcomes Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol (POWER) Study

    Ripollés-Melchor J, Ramírez-Rodríguez JM, Casans-Francés R, et al. · JAMA Surg · 2019

    Key finding

    In 2084 patients having elective colorectal surgery at 80 Spanish centers, care in a self-declared ERAS center was associated with fewer moderate-to-severe complications (25.2% vs 30.3%; OR 0.77). Overall adherence was 63.6%, and the highest-adherence quartile had far fewer moderate-to-severe complications than the lowest (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.25–0.46).

    Clinical significance

    Having a protocol is not the same as delivering it. Real-world adherence was incomplete even in ERAS centers, and the adherence gradient tracked outcomes.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Multicenter prospective cohort
    Population
    2084 consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery at 80 centers in Spain
    Intervention or exposure
    Care in self-declared ERAS vs non-ERAS centers; adherence to 22 ERAS items
    Endpoints
    Moderate to severe complications at 30 days (primary); adherence, mortality, readmission, reoperation, length of stay
    Limitations
    Observational; patients who complete more ERAS elements may be healthier or recovering better. One country, one month of follow-up.
  • Observational

    Postoperative ERAS Interventions Have the Greatest Impact on Optimal Recovery: Experience With Implementation of ERAS Across Multiple Hospitals

    Aarts MA, Rotstein OD, Pearsall EA, et al. · Ann Surg · 2018

    Key finding

    Across 15 academic hospitals implementing ERAS for colorectal surgery (2876 patients), only 20.1% of patients received compliant care in all phases. Postoperative elements had the poorest compliance (40.3%) yet were most strongly associated with optimal recovery (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.81–2.47).

    Clinical significance

    The recovery phase is where enhanced recovery pathways most often break down and where adherence appears to matter most. Implementation effort weighted toward the preoperative and intraoperative phases leaves the largest gap unaddressed.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Multicenter prospective cohort within a structured implementation program (iERAS, Ontario)
    Population
    2876 adults undergoing colorectal surgery at 15 academic hospitals
    Intervention or exposure
    ERAS implementation; compliance with >75% of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative elements
    Endpoints
    Optimal recovery (discharge within 5 days without major complication, readmission or death)
    Limitations
    Observational; postoperative compliance partly reflects how well patients are recovering, so the association may run in both directions. Academic hospitals only.
  • Observational

    Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: a strategy to transform surgical care across a health system

    Gramlich LM, Sheppard CE, Wasylak T, et al. · Implement Sci · 2017

    Key finding

    System-wide ERAS implementation for colorectal surgery across six Alberta Health Services sites raised guideline compliance from 40% to 65%. Analysis of 2188 quotes from 189 documents found barriers and enablers spread across clinical practice (22%), individual providers (26%), patients (25%), organization (19%) and external environment (7%).

    Clinical significance

    Evidence-based protocols spread only with deliberate implementation. This study used established implementation-science frameworks (TDF and QUERI) to show where adoption succeeds or stalls, with patients accounting for a quarter of the barriers and enablers.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Mixed-methods implementation study (QUERI model, Theoretical Domains Framework)
    Population
    Six hospital sites in one Canadian provincial health system; colorectal surgery
    Intervention or exposure
    Staged ERAS implementation with interactive audit and feedback
    Endpoints
    Guideline compliance; thematic analysis of barriers and enablers
    Limitations
    One health system. Patient outcomes are not reported in this abstract.
  • Observational

    Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery

    Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, et al. · Arch Surg · 2011

    Key finding

    As adherence to the ERAS protocol rose from 43.3% to 70.6% in 953 patients having colorectal cancer surgery, postoperative complications (OR 0.73) and symptoms (OR 0.53) fell. Adverse outcomes declined stepwise with adherence above 70%, 80% and 90%, and restriction of intravenous fluid and a preoperative carbohydrate drink were major independent predictors.

    Clinical significance

    This was among the first studies to show a dose-response relationship between protocol adherence and outcomes. It made measuring adherence a core part of delivering enhanced recovery.

    View study on PubMed (opens in a new tab)
    Study details
    Design
    Single-center prospective cohort, before and after protocol reinforcement
    Population
    953 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery in Stockholm (2002–2007)
    Intervention or exposure
    Reinforced adherence to the ERAS protocol
    Endpoints
    Postoperative complications, symptoms, length of stay, readmissions
    Limitations
    Single center with a before-and-after design, so secular changes in care may contribute.
  • Proposed framework

    The Perioperative Health loop: Understand → Prepare → Care → Recover → Learn

    PERIOME · Proposed. Not validated.

    What it proposes

    PERIOME proposes that Perioperative Health runs as a continuous loop across the surgical journey: understand the patient, prepare them, support care, follow recovery, and learn from each outcome so the next patient is better understood. Clinical care remains the surgical team's domain; the loop connects the periods around it.

    Why it matters

    Enhanced recovery research shows that outcomes track how consistently care is delivered across phases, and that the recovery phase is where adherence most often falls. A loop that measures delivery and feeds what is learned back into preparation addresses the gaps that single-phase programs leave.

    What has to be shown
    Design
    Proposed operating model
    Population
    Patients across the surgical journey and the teams that care for them
    Validation ahead
    The loop has to be evaluated as an intervention: implementation studies that measure reach, adherence and fidelity in each phase; prospective comparisons of patient-reported recovery, days at home and complications; and evidence that what is learned in one cohort measurably improves care for the next. No outcome data exist yet.

Entries summarize independent published research and link to the original studies; consult the full papers for complete methods and results. Findings concern the interventions, nutrients and populations studied, not any PERIOME product. The library is educational and is not medical advice.

Research collaboration

A field is only as strong as its evidence.

PERIOME works with clinicians and investigators studying readiness, preparation and recovery, and welcomes suggestions for the library.

Research collaboration

Proposed frameworks are not validated and are not diagnostic or clinical devices.